Judgment handed down in Malik v Malik
Law firm Stephenson Harwood LLP has advised a longstanding client, Mr Malik, on a successful outcome in Malik v Malik [2025] EWHC 2485 (Ch), a heavily-contested jurisdiction challenge arising from a complex family dispute.
The High Court ruled that England was not the appropriate forum (forum conveniens) for the proceedings, that service (if even effected) should be set aside, and further that the claim was strikeable on the grounds of abuse of process.
The Stephenson Harwood team was led by partner Adam Polonsky, who instructed James Kinman of Maitland Chambers. James has appeared in a number of connected applications relating to the underlying claim.
分享文章
相关专业知识
相关文章
Beyond drip pricing: what the Ryanair investigation tells us about the CMA’s consumer enforcement agenda
Competition
Good faith required in director's actions - Supreme Court sets the standard for directors’ conduct under s.172
Commercial Litigation
The Mills Review: AI and the future of retail financial services
Regulatory & Investigations
No admission, no infringement, £1 million paid: why the FCA's commodities competition case matters
Commercial Litigation
Stephenson Harwood advises Eagle Football Group and Olympique Lyonnais on debt restructuring
Finance
Procedural pragmatism: service validity, court fees and limitation in three recent cases
Commercial Litigation
The ISDA jurisdiction clause after Brexit: Torino and the road still to travel
Commercial Litigation
Breach of duty but potentially no unfair prejudice: Song v Smith
Commercial Litigation
The Italian swaps litigation: Torino at trial
Commercial Litigation
Stephenson Harwood wins six awards at China Business Law Awards 2026
Hong Kong